tower:riser=yes seems good and in need it could be enhanced with yes being replaced by power, telecommunication etc. For basic processing it is simple (any value but "no" means some sort of riser) if more precise info is needed, the information is there. LM_1
2011/12/14 Владимир Поквалитов <p...@isnet.ru>: >> I'd suggest to use >> power:riser=yes instead of riser=power (to remain compatible if we >> should decide to map telco lines as well in the future, so we could >> use telecommunication:riser for those). > > I'd suggest to use "tower:riser=yes" (or "tower:riser=*"). So we can > use the same tag not only for power towers but for any (i.e. > communication) tower that a risers. > power=tower, man_made=tower do fit well with the "power:" namespace > because they explain the "tower" value of any root tag. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
