What are we pretending, for the sake of argument, that access=destination and access=private mean?
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> wrote: > http://mapper.acme.com/?ll=28.42073,-81.58224&z=15&t=K&marker0=28.41788%2C-81.57674&marker1=28.41250%2C-81.59031&marker2=28.42977%2C-81.57694 > This is the area behind the Magic Kingdom in Walt Disney World. > > Signs going northbound at A and B say "Service & Authorized Vehicles Only". > > Southbound at C, a sign says "Private Property / Walt Disney World Resort > Guest, Cast, and Business Invitees Only". > > (I verified A and C a few days ago; it's possible that B has changed > recently.) > > The exact tags to use for these are a matter of recent debate, and it's not > worth rehashing that. But it's clear that they are different (a guest can > enter Disney from Reams but can't exit that way), so for the sake of > argument let's call the former access=private and the latter > access=destination. Note that the area from A and B south to the beginning > of the motorway is also access=destination due to the presence of the main > entrance gate (and a sign identical to that at C on Vista west of Golden > Oak). > > The question is how the segments of road between these points should be > tagged. Should the ability to U-turn be taken into account (thus everything > but the close vicinity of A and B is destination in both directions)? Or > should it be assumed that one won't U-turn for the hell of it (thus all > three roads are private northbound and destination southbound)? Or should > no_straight_on restrictions be used at the signs, with no access tags on the > ways? > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
