On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvi...@helsinki.fi> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Erik Johansson wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Ilya Zverev <zve...@textual.ru> wrote: >> >> aren't we better of without building=entrance? I really >> hope that DWG can be kept out of this. >> >> Further I would like to propose railway=subway_entrance => >> entrance=public_transport, since it's probably interesting to have on >> bus/boat/rail terminals as well, now this is a bit more tricky sinceer >> it already renders. > > Please let me know when did my private renderer for those > building=entrances cease being something that renders (besides the times > when my VM is down of course :-))? ...Honestly, I think you just _assumed_ > that nobody is using the data for anything
I assumed you would love to get rid of that tag, I might not have put it in the best way so I'll include what was said by Tobias: > Tobias Knerr: >> What makes this case interesting beyond the relatively trivial tagging >> issue is that it raises the question whether we, as a community, are >> able to revise earlier decisions. >> To me it seems obvious that we need the ability to do so. >> But it is also apparent that we have no working process - not even an >> informal one - for handling data model changes. /Erik _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
