On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 21:02 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On 10/1/2011 8:36 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 19:48 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > >> On 10/1/2011 6:19 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > >>> So much so that the anal-retentive opposition to such tagging is > >>> creating problems for mapping areas that explicitly assign such ratings > >>> officially! > >> > >> Assuming you're talking about some variant of the "bicycle level of > >> service", why would that belong on the map? We don't have tags for car > >> level of service. > > > > Sure we do. highway=trunk, highway=motorway, highway=primary...these > > tend to be primarily if not exclusively motorist-oriented in practice. > > Level of service is a technical concept that says how well a highway > handles the traffic it is given. I don't know if this article is any > good, but it covers the topic: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_of_service
Well, the issue that Metro's trying to cover in migrating Bike There! to OpenStreetMap is that Bike There! does have LOS data. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
