On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> wrote: > How does this sound for a compromise? > > Many ways are not tagged with the total number of lanes at all points, but > only with the number of through lanes. Therefore, end users should treat the > lanes tag as a minimum rather than an exact number. Subtags (lanes:straight, > lanes:right, etc.) or [[Relations/Proposed/turn lanes|turn lane relations]] > can be used to provide more detail as well as an assurance that all lanes > are mapped.
That doesn't sound like a compromise at all. It sounds like exactly what you've been arguing for all along. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
