2011/9/6 "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" <[email protected]>: > as I've stated during voting, I don't think water=* is much of an > improvement in tagging scheme of water bodies. I'm still curious - how > do you tag natural lake that is used as a reservoir of water?
I'd go with landuse=reservoir, natural=water, water=lake but http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dreservoir states IMHO very unnecessarily that those have to be man_made. > The > existence of man-made or natural water body and its usage by man kind > are simply two different things. +1 BTW, the same goes for forests - not every area covered by trees is used > for forestry and not every area that is used for forestry is right now > covered by trees (but probably will be in a couple of years). +1, that's why I tag areas covered by trees additionally with landcover=trees. There is also a page in the wiki about landcover (I'd say it is still an early draft though). cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
