We can't use addr:housename, because it will be wrong. If I understand
correctly, addr:housename is used for buildings, that have their own
specific name. If there is no a street, it doesn't mean, that house
has its own name. About addr:full - we can write name of territorial
zone in addr:full or in addr:street, but the problem is not in absence
of place, where we can write an address not to lose it, but in absence
of tag, showing, that address is full and we didn't lose name of
street. For example, I have two buildings: one is in village A at
street B and has number 1 ("village A, street B, number 1"), the
second one is in village B and has number 2 ("village B, housenumber
2"). If I write addr:city=A + addr:housenumber=1 and addr:city=B +
addr:housenumber=2, software will think, that there is a mistake in
both addresses (no street). But mistake is only in first address. If I
have an address "Big town, Good Place, 1" and write "Good Place" in
addr:full or in addr:street, software will write "error: I can't find
street with name Good Place on the map; please, add it to OSM".2011/7/25 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > 2011/7/25 OSM user <o...@fizik.spb.ru>: >> Hello! >> Please, look at >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/addr:territory . >> I suppose to use this tag for addresses, which doesn't contain name of >> some street (for example, there are no street in some villages, there >> are addresses "<name of territory>, <number of house>"). > > > What about addr:housename and addr:full ? > > Cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
