On 4 June 2011 17:44, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 9:10 AM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 4 June 2011 17:02, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: >>> I don't know of any, but I would go with emergency=phone, and specify >>> maybe in another tag phone=fire_alarm or some such thing. >>> The description of emergency=phone includes 'making calls to emergency >>> services' so it is not necessarily restricted to switches. >> >> I didn't see any phone, just appears to have a switch you pull to >> trigger an alarm. >> > I'm sorry, I misunderstood - you're saying *your* fire alarms don't > have two-way communication. > emergency=phone is misleading then, as it implies two-way > communication. emergency=alarm would be my intuitive choice too, then.
We don't have anything like that here, I was just going off the photo, it seems from the description it would be an emergency phone for someone wanting police, but just a dumb switch for fire. As for tagging, emergency:police=phone, emergency:fire=switch maybe? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
