I'm not sure that I understand your problem. Currently when people see something they decide what to tag it, based on what other people have used in the past and/or what's documented on the wiki - some people are seeing things for which they think "foo=bar" is appropriate. Often the choice of tag is very subjective and far from straightforward. If you haven't been to the place that they're mapping, how can you say that they're wrong and you're right?

Are you trying to create a schema into which all of the "foos" of the world fit, and impose that on mappers? If so, OSM may not be the project for that - it's strength is very much that mappers can make things up as they go along, and tag usage can evolve beyond what a bunch of people at the start of the project thought was needed.

If you're coming at this from a data usage perspective, then regardless of how people map going forward there are an awful lot of "cycleway=track" out there and you're going to have to either (a) deal with them or (b) do a large amount of worldwide surveying and remapping.

Cheers,
Andy


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to