On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 10:49:18 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On 4/3/2011 9:38 AM, Phil! Gold wrote: > > * Ed Hillsman<ehills...@tampabay.rr.com> > > [2011-04-02 22:26 -0400]: > >> Would it work to add a tag "associated_street" and then simply list the > >> name of the street? For example, highway=footway, > >> associated_street="East Fowler Avenue". > > > > This might not be a bad idea. It makes the association without using a > > relation (about which there have been concerns raised regarding the > > complexity of handling, both for mappers and data consumers). > > One question is how 'overlaps' would be handled. For example, > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/56026919 is part of the sidewalk > for both Magnolia and Anderson.
With relations, it's easy... :) -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
