sorry for joining late into this discussion. By looking again at the proposal I think that besides the re-naming of protect_id to protect_class we could also think about other issues.
If you look at 97 and 98: "protected by continental agreements. They often cover sites already protected by national law." there is already a potential collision in the focus: how would you deal with several protection "operators" / institutions? Are you aware of: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/heritage There is some overlap between this and boundary=protected_area. Shouldn't we try incorporate all kind of protection into the new proposal? ( boundary=protected_area already names cultural protection). Cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
