On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:53:39 -0400, Josh Doe wrote: > David, > I like this proposal, it should work well for the areas I've been > mapping. However I have been using the proposed sloped_curb=yes [1], > though I haven't been happy with it. There's also the proposed > kerb=lowered [2], which seems equivalent. I'd say either kerb or ramp > should win out, but I think kerb is more versatile.
I must confess I don't have a particular opinion on ramp/kerb/sloped_curb. "ramp" IIRC it's already an "official" tag. However, I guess these are tiny details, and we should instead focus on the main "sidewalk" tagging :) You can see a couple of sidewalks tagged this way (load the areas in your favourite editor, since we'd need some more zoom): http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=37.649984&mlon=12.597751&zoom=18&layers=M http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=37.58996&mlon=12.787694&zoom=18&layers=M http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=37.584398&mlon=12.843977&zoom=18&layers=M These are mainly proofs-of-concept, since my area needs other things before getting to sidewalk-mapping :) Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
