2011/1/26 Johan Jönsson <joha...@goteborg.cc>: > This is an old proposal, that have been discussed before. It lead to a > rewriting > and instead of natural=rock it is proposed natural=bare_rock. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/bare_rock > > It is supposed to be a tag for land cover. > /Johan Jönsson
If it is a tag for landcover, why do you propose it in "natural" ? Natural is IMHO about geographic features like bay, spring, coastline, cliff, volcano, beach, peak and not about landcover like sand, rock, mud, ... OK, actually it is not yet strictly like this, but if we start assigning new values in this scheme it could move in this direction. You said yourself: "It is supposed to be a tag for land cover." cheers, Martin PS: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landcover _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
