On Sat, 01 Jan 2011 10:36:54 -0500 Greg Troxel <g...@ir.bbn.com> wrote:
> If part of the goal is advocacy for bike safety, then I think it makes > sense to find a cycling organization, like http://www.bikeleague.org/ > and to find out what their standards are for cycle lane safety, and > then to have a scheme to represent conformance (but not tie that to > "is it a bike lane"). agreed In Australia there is a minimum width for a bike lane, which does not include the concrete guttering. Anything less than this is not a bike lane, whether it has a sign or not. The local-sign-erecting-authority should also have a warning sign for the bridge where the allocated space is just too small. Bike_lane=undernourished and bike_lane=death_trap are what spring to mind. I'd ride in the car lane or use another street _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging