Ulf Lamping napsal(a): > Am 17.11.2010 21:43, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer: > Of course there is a logic, it's just a logic that you don't like and > therefore deny to recognize ;-)
I was wondering for some time what is that logic? > You are implying there's an "obviously correct way" to make these > distinctions, which is not the case. If you take a look at: > > http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Blaubeerwald.jpg > > the "physical landcover" would be bushes for me and certainly not trees. > You may disagree. There will always be some border cases. I would put value trees in landcover, since it is the most noticable type of landcover there - the fact that there is something secondary on the ground should be resolved with another way... Anyway, how would you tag it in current scheme? Petr
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
