On Miércoles 03 Noviembre 2010 19:14:45 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer escribió: > 2010/11/3 Tobias Knerr <o...@tobias-knerr.de>: > > M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >> The mapfeatures declare that url should not be used and website should > >> be used instead. Is this a common agreement? I find url used 3,5 times > >> more often (260 000) then website (66 800) in the database. > > > > "website" is intended for "the official website for a feature". > > > > "url" was never as clearly defined and is therefore used for lots of > > different stuff, including Wikipedia links, photographs and internal > > (= intended for other mappers) documentation. > > > > Therefore, "website" does *not* replace "url" - it should only replace > > "url" for those cases where the URL is the official website for the > > tagged feature. > > Similarly, the "wikipedia" key should partially replace "url", for those > > cases where the URL is a Wikipedia link, and "image" should be used for > > URLs of images. > > If there is consensus for this interpretation, the mapfeatures are > wrong IMHO. They depict url as deprecated (stroked through). > > Cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Tobias's interpretation sounds very good to me Noel er Envite
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
