On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Noel David Torres Taño <env...@rolamasao.org> wrote: > Thanks to both. My problem is this: I have a street in a city, in a pedestrian > zone, but it is small enough to be unsuitable for cars.
I don't think there's a clear line. If it has a name that suggests it was once a normal street, it would probably be pedestrian. Is there enough room that an emergency vehicle can use it? > > Near that, I have another one, just in the limits of the urban zone (maybe we > can call it outskirts), just as wide as a man, walls on both sides, and it is > the only access to some houses. I'd almost definitely call that a footway. Perhaps it makes sense to have a correspondence unclassified:pedestrian::service:footway. In other words, if you'd tag it service (such as an alley) if it allowed cars, it would be footway, but if you'd tag it unclassified/residential (or higher) it would be pedestrian. And if it's too narrow for cars, it would be footway (unless it was historically wider and still has the feel of a street?). _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging