2010/10/26 John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com>: > On 26 October 2010 07:53, Alex Mauer <ha...@hawkesnest.net> wrote: >> I would consider those to be informal=yes, were I to use this tag. > > As Felix pointed out, that doesn't add anything useful to describe the > current state of the path, only how it may have been formed,
"anything useful" vs "only" ;-) I understand that you don't consider this useful, I do. Especially in parks. > the first > picture you posted looks like it would be much easier to traverse than > the second, but tagging as informal doesn't tell me that. and? Nobody ever said informal would add information about the ease to use. Cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
