On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 7:46 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/10/18 Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com>: >> I'm wondering if there's any benefit in mapping "paper streets" - >> streets that have been officially dedicated to the government by the >> former landowner but that have not (yet) been constructed. For >> example, they may explain a truncated grid >> (http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=28.39687&lon=-81.50172&zoom=17&layers=M) >> or two disconnected streets having the same name, and they are often >> used in legal land descriptions. >> >> Some of these qualify for highway=proposed. But if there are no >> current plans to build them, would it be a good idea to map them as >> (for example) highway=paper name=*? > > usually they are mapped > > highway=proposed > proposed=primary/motorway/etc,
Did you read my second paragraph? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
