On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Steve Bennett <stevag...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Jason Cunningham > <jamicu...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> I think Brownfield would be useful for mapping current status of previously >> developed land, not currently used, and where the future use is unknown or >> not agreed upon. > > Agreed. There are plenty of tracts of land you can see in aerial > photos that have clearly had something previously (including things as > mundane as car parking or sheds), but it would be difficult to know if > there are actually plans for future development.
Here (Florida) the land will be rezoned PD (planned development). _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
