Richard Welty-2 wrote:
>
> i think the situation is that the information is already lost.
>
I dont't think so. Considering that 75% of the trees are from only 3 users,
they could be quickly fixed.
bye
Nop
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/tagging-single-trees-tp5501462p5505433.html
Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
