On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 6:14 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > Many people are tagging single trees, and usually use natural=tree for > this. Now there are some voices on the German ML that say, > natural=tree is reserved for "special" trees, and can therefore not be > used for "ordinary" trees. > > I changed the wiki according to what I perceive actual usage, by > changing "lone or significant" to "single". Unfortunately this is > disputed at least by a few people. > > What are your opinions on that?
What's significant? I've used natural=tree to map each of the trees in a parking lot. I figure each tree is significant to, for instance, a blind person making their way through the parking lot, though I wouldn't call any of the trees "special". _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
