* M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> [2010-08-30 17:40 +0200]: > 2010/8/30 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > >> - "these objects express the same thing as that object but in more > >> detail" (eg, one line representing a pair or more of train lines) > > in this actual example you don't need relations but can do as with > streets (lanes-tag). I'm not sure on the best syntax though: should it > be tracks=4 or lanes=4? The latter is less correct regarding the > language but doesn't require additional tags.
There is a proposal for a tracks= tag: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Multiple_Tracks -- ...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/ PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2 --- -- Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army. -- Edward Everett ---- --- -- _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
