On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Cartinus <carti...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > On Sunday 29 August 2010 07:59:51 John Smith wrote: >> however the current suggestion of a do-ocracy seems doomed to >> end in endless/pointless disputes as well, take a look at the most >> recent pointless thread over culverts. > > That is actually not an example of the do-ocracy way. Because the people that > do (those who tagged culverts) had pretty much united behind culvert=yes.
culvert=yes is ambiguous: does it refer to the object on top or underneath? (Distinguishing based on whether it's water or not doesn't work; you could have a road under a canal.) > > Then we got the people who like pointless discussions that wanted to change > something they were not even mapping. I've used bridge=culvert and tunnel=culvert since long before the recent discussion. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
