In other words, you are saving that the ground shows many paths, made by both humans and cows. If the only place where the ground was trodden down enough to be bare or sparse were along the footpath, you would have the situation that M∡rtin described.
-------Original Email------- Subject :Re: [Tagging] sidewalks From :mailto:li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk Date :Sat Aug 28 05:47:12 America/Chicago 2010 On 28/08/2010 10:51, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > You can actually see informal footways/paths quite well in aerial > imagery. If they are there and you have good resolution images. > Usually the grass is aside then, because grass doesn't grow where > people (or animals) walk. It disappears even if it was there before. Your eyesight must be better than mine - often where I walk paths are marked by a footpath sign or just a stone squeezer stile at either side of a field. Any marks left by walkers would get obliterated by cows going back and forth twice a day. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging -- John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com "Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
