Hi Kim, Hi Peter.
I agree to both of you.
I dislike the big pot "amenity" so it's a good turn to recategorize tags
to other tags fitting better, here I see that.
Nevertheless that should be mentioned in the proposal.
Two remarks to the proposal from me:
1) fee=yes|no should be added to the combination tags
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fee)
2) I think, there are often saunas for mixed gender and others with
separation - and the next with some times the one way, other times the
other way. I think that's an important information for a lot of people
searching for a sauna.
regards
Peter
On 27.08.2010 15:34, Peter Körner wrote:
Hi Kim,
why exactly do you want to convert a widely used tag (amenity=sauna,
~1000 uses) to a very rarely used tag (leisure=sauna, ~13 uses).
The Proposal does not tell why this change is required.
Peter
Am 27.08.2010 14:31, schrieb Kim Slotte:
Hello,
There is plans to replace amenity=sauna with leisure=sauna. Also usage
access in combination is proposed.
Feel free to discuss about the map feature at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Sauna
Br, Kim S
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
