On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:32 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > but doesn't this not just reduce the bike traffic to the opposite > direction? Would you say that the oneway direction is already > implicit?
cycleway=opposite_lane means travel in *both* the forward direction, and the backward direction. I don't think we have a way to express a road which has a cycleway only in the opposite direction (that actually doesn't sound that crazy, I'm sure I've seen things like that in France - when riding with traffic, there are no markings, but against traffic there is a lane primarily to stop cars from thinking you're breaking the law). Or maybe I'm not reading the wiki correctly. I suppose a much simpler scheme could have been invented, but anyway. Steve Maybe adding a cycleway:lanes=2 could clarify (at least for > humans). Btw.: when adding lanes-tag to highways: do you count > cycleway-lanes? > > cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
