On 7/19/10 2:55 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Richard Welty<rwe...@averillpark.net>  wrote:

i might add that if we're looking at the introduction of new semantics in
order
to make adding unpaved=yes/no ok, it's going to take a great deal to
convince
me.
It's not "adding" new semantics, it's *articulating* the semantics
that probably exist anyway.
no, they don't exist. no one has apparently considered the issue before.
we need to be asking ourselves:

1) are these semantics useful enough to add?

2) what are the implications of adding them? (they will directly
impact rendering engines and other consumers of data.)

richard


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to