Am 10.06.2010 15:22, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer: > 2010/6/10 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>: >> 2010/6/10 fly <lowfligh...@googlemail.com>: >>> Have a look: >>> http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/display/17927910 >>> >>> I said it is even more complicated and even on this picture you do not see >>> all >>> steps ! >> >> >> OK, but the steps on the picture are not that complicated. You need >> only 2 relations: one with 11 steps (or 12 if the lowest step is a >> real step I can't see it in the picture) for the regular part, and one >> with 2 steps for the upper end.
and what happens with the rest of the steps on the right-hand-side You can not see it but the top 2 steps go off shape on the right side. - leads to one more relation. > And you don't need lateral roles, 2 ways (upper and lower) in each > relation are fine. Ok. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
