2010/5/18 "Petr Morávek [Xificurk]" <xific...@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
> I had finally some time to write down some proposal of sub-tagging for
> leisure=garden as discussed earlier.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Garden_specification
>
> Since I'm no big gardener any comments and suggestions are more than
> welcomed.


Thanks for putting this up. I would actually try to reduce some of it
to the necessary:
"The most common form of garden, located in proximity to a residence,
usually private access only. The main purpose is usually relaxation
activities. " - I would delete "The main purpose is usually relaxation
activities. " because it restricts without benefit.

"Botanical gardens are generally well-tended parks displaying a wide
range of plants labeled with their botanical names. They may contain
specialist plant collections such as cacti and succulent plants, herb
gardens, plants from particular parts of the world, and so on."
I would put it more into a scientific context: "Botanical gardens are
scientifically structured and labelled collections of living plants
with the purpose of scientific research, conservation, display and
education."

" garden:style=kitchen - These gardens have usually no aesthetic
function, they're used for growing vegetable, herbs, etc. "

I would delete "These gardens have usually no aesthetic function"
because it is IMHO not usefull and depends on taste.

I added garden:style=rosarium.


Are there any ideas how to solve the problem that this more or less
obsoletes leisure=park? Shall we allow the values garden:type and
garden:style for parks as well? This could be done by simply avoiding
the prefix ("type" and "style" without the garden).

Cheers,
Martin

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to