On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Matthias Julius <li...@julius-net.net>wrote:
> Eugene Alvin Villar <sea...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Pieren <pier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> I have indeed tagged a couple of these, using "highway=service, > >>> service=drive-through, access=private, oneway=yes". > >>> > >>> > >> highway=service + oneway=yes + access=destination > >> > >> Pieren > >> > > > > An explicit tag would be better since routers can then let the user > filter > > for fast food restaurants that have drive-throughs and then route them to > > the selected drive-through entrance appropriately. > > Whether or not a restaurant (or pharmacy, or bank, or whatever) has a > drive-through should be a property of the restaurant and not of the > street, IMO. > Yeah, but then how do you route the person to the proper entrance? Sounds like a job for a relation, really. But so far I've been too lazy to map that much detail. And I still don't like access=destination. If access=destination means "a privately owned road which should only be used for access to a building, motorway service station, beach, campsite, industrial estate, business park, etc" then access=destination is already implied by highway=service.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
