A relation could be added between the area bounding the playground, and the equipment within it. I've tried this out and commented on the discussion page - http://osm.org/go/0EGASSRdQ-- is a link to a playground near me that I've tagged in this way. There is a proposed schema for identifying relationships which would suit our purposes - tag the relation as a type ='site' , site = 'playground', name=* . This will make mapping it a little more complex but should make performing searches a bit simpler.
If someone has made the extra effort to identify /what/ is in the playground, then they should be able to have a reasonable stab at laying out /where/ the items are even if it's not completely precise. On 26 March 2010 11:48, Peteris Krisjanis <pec...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think you can either just add information about playground, or do > both - add information and point where actual stuff are. It's add a > little redundancy for consistency, but I think it's worth it. > > Peter. > > 2010/3/26 Cartinus <carti...@xs4all.nl>: >> On Friday 26 March 2010 02:30:58 Craig Wallace wrote: >>> IMO it would be more useful to map the locations of individual play >>> equipment. >> >> Except that most mappers don't have the equipment and/or time to do this >> accurately. In that case putting the tags on the playground is better. >> >> -- >> m.v.g., >> Cartinus >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
