On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Pieren <pier...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Alan Mintz > <alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net<alan_mintz%2b...@earthlink.net> > > wrote: > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: > >> The vast majority of intersections in OSM are complete (that is, all turn >> restrictions have been tagged). Of course, that's because the vast majority >> of intersections in OSM don't have any turn restrictions. >> > > Can you provide statistics, numbers ? >
Not easily. And what about the oneway tag ? Most of the restrictions are coming from > that restriction. No relation needed. Then to be sure that no oneway are > missing, someone already suggested to add the oneway=no in all roads that > are verified as non oneways (many roads are surveyed from satellite > imagery). Yet another tag to add in the long, long list of attributs that > must be provided. > *Nod*. Using the current tagging system for what really amounts to metadata isn't particularly efficient. I wouldn't try to stop someone from adding oneway=no if they wanted to, though. Just because one person uses the tag doesn't mean everyone must always provide it.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
