On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Richard Welty <rwe...@averillpark.net>wrote:
> On 1/5/10 10:01 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: > > Trouble is, current usage (and renderer support) treats "highway=path" > > very differently from "highway=footway". It seems to mean "walking > > track with unmade surface". > > > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.77494&lon=-73.81625&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF > > this shows a segment of the Mohawk Hudson Bike-Hike Trail. i haven't yet > switched it all over to use > > highway=path+bicycle=designated+foot=designated > > so the left side is still tagged > > highway=cycleway > > it renders the same in mapnik and osmarender for both tagging > approaches. so what renderers are challenged > by this, exactly? > > Oh, cool! Sorry for the mistake. It must be the use of "bicycle=designated" - I think I've used "bicycle=yes" in the past, and just seen the generic "highway=path" rendering. That's quite interesting... So, the only cases where disagreement remains would be where a path is not *designated* a bike path, but acts/looks like one. Hmm. Steve
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
