On Tuesday 08 December 2009 17:53:33 Anthony wrote: > >Information about tag support is a *good* thing, not a bad one. I now > > > > realise that Mapnik doesn't recognise *any* sport=* tags, but that's not > > going to stop me using them. But it will make me be careful to always use > > it with a tag that it *does* support as well. See how this is beneficial? > > Actually, I think that's a good example of the harmfulness in tagging for a > renderer. We shouldn't have redundant data in the database, at least when > this is at all feasible.
Wow, so now it is already harmfull to osm to know you have to map leisure=sports_centre|pitch|track|etc in addition to sport=* to have it show up with renderer X, but with renderer Y there would be no need for that. -- m.v.g., Cartinus _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
