On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 6:22 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer > <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2009/11/4 Richard Bullock <[email protected]> >>> >>> A passageway through a building (but, say, without being inside that >>> building) is, to all intents and purposes, a tunnel. >> >> a passageway through a building that is not inside that building will be >> hard to find. (how do you define: is not inside?) > > http://maps.google.com/maps?oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&ie=UTF8&q=mosi+tampa&fb=1&gl=us&hq=mosi&hnear=tampa&cid=0,0,4145233176872570172&ei=kpbxSpL3BtTY8Aa95d2MCQ&ved=0CA0QnwIwAA&ll=28.054341,-82.404791&spn=0,359.981289&t=h&z=16&layer=c&cbll=28.054341,-82.404885&panoid=utISmaJ6ph__dBBezFDBpQ&cbp=12,185.93,,0,0.05 >
Currently tagged as a "tunnel", although positioned incorrectly (http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=28.05335&lon=-82.404758&zoom=18&layers=B000FTF). Which is fine, as long as the definition of tunnel is changed. The definition needs to be changed, because I don't want my routing device to tell me to "make a right and go through the tunnel". And I don't want dotted lines when these passages are rendered - because if I look at that I'm going to expect something that goes underground, and I'm going to be confused when there's no tunnel, but just a building which was built over top of a road. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
