2009/10/28 Lesi <l...@lesi.is-a-geek.net> > > how do you define "main area"? > > Aren't the shafts vertical access / ventilation shafts that > > lead to the inner mine? IMHO that defines them as > > part of the mine (and indicates that they should be comprised). > > The main area is the area where all the bigger buildings of the mine are.
IMHO the mine is the mine, not buildings. The buildings are buildings (also as tag: building=xy). They could/should be also comprised in the mine polygon/ relation. > An > airshaft could be a single node outside of this area -> inside of the mining area (which would be underground but in projection still occupy the same space). > > You almost always know the name of the mine. But it is too complicated to > create a relation for the mineshaft, to assosiate it with that mine - > escpecially when only the mineshaft is mapped. > > It's not more complicated than any other relation: just add all parts as members. The easiest case is just the mineshaft beeing mapped: the relation then has only one member (till other parts get added/mapped). > > All mineshafts i know have their own name. That's why you cannot use the > name-tag for the name of the mine. > > So at the moment there are: > name -> name of the mineshaft itself > mine -> name of the mine which the mineshaft is part of > operator -> name of the operator of the mine > > OK, seems reasonable (and easy to map, what is always important in OSM). cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
