Pieren wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer > > <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2009/10/15 Ben Laenen <benlae...@gmail.com>: > >> Anthony wrote: > >> The only way I see we can solve all this is to get a new tag which is > >> exclusively used for ground cover. Such a tag would then stop having all > >> ambiguity, and stop all discussions like "is a lake in a wood part of > >> the wood or not?". > > > > +1, I agree. > > If you go back to the archives, you will see that it was the original > purpose of the key "landuse".
It obviously failed at that completely. The most used tags (landuse=residential, industrial, farm, commercial, military, retail...) don't give any detail about ground cover. It has become so bad that I don't see a way to even try to fix this with the landuse tag. It has to go back to the drawing board without thinking about tags that are in use today. Ben _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
