Ok, so my big question is: Why are your property boundaries rendered with solid fill? Its not indicating land use, and should be rendered as a 'dash-dot-dot-dash' line. (at least thats how i remember it from drafting class)
So if the property boundaries arnt filled in, then there is room to go around and tag areas of 'landuse=residential; or farmland or protected_area or industrial or what ever. Its after the area has been tagged with an appropriate landuse tag, that it becomes clear where the roads 'should technically' be, and there is also (I think) a tag landuse=civil (to show that the city owns it) Me hopes that makes sence :) cheers, Sam On 10/13/09, John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com> wrote: > Unless anyone has an objection I propose that we tagged non-existent > roads from DCDB Qld as: > > highway=gazetted_road > > Anything that hasn't been surveyed can be tagged as highway=road which > is consistent with current usage, these will also be rendered enough > to indicate they need to be surveyed and hopefully this will encourage > people to participate even if they don't have a GPS. > > I updated the wiki as well to reflect this: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#What_about_using_meta_information_from_the_DCDB_Qld_date.3F > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > talk...@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > -- Twitter: @Acrosscanada Blog: http://Acrosscanadatrails.blogspot.com Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans OpenStreetMap IRC: http://irc.openstreetmap.org @Acrosscanadatrails _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
