Hi There, I'm writing this as the Debian procps packager. I hope you can clear something up for me. Please CC me as I'm not on the list.
I got some emails saying that pidof is moving from sysvinit-tools or sysvinit-utils and needed a home, so I (as procps upstream) agreed that it can have a home there. When I discussed how this would work within Debian, there was some confusion about it going at all? I couldn't see much in your email list about this happening. Is there two projects? One for RedHat and one for others? Is pidof moving? Are there plans to remove killall5 which shares a lot of its code as well? If there are two projects and "your" project is keeping pidof but the RedHat one is not, I can keep one pidof in upstream procps but as the Debian maintainer keep that pidof out (and the sysvinit-tools packagers will keep pidof there). It may be odd, but it would work. Some answers would be great. I've held off doing anything with the Debian procps package until I know what is going on. - Craig -- Craig Small (@smallsees) http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
