On Mon, 21.07.14 20:23, Timofey Titovets ([email protected]) wrote: > Just completed TODO: > * readahead: use BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG_RANGE instead of BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG > ioctl, with START_IO
Hmm, the patch is line broken... But this patch only replaces one ioctl with another right? It doesn't actually improve anything effectively, does it? I am not really convinced that we should make this change, maybe we should remove readahead from the the package instead... > > commit d3fc81bd6a5a046b22600ac1204df220c93d2c15 refs/tags/v30 > Author: Lennart Poettering <[email protected]> > Date: Wed Jun 15 15:39:10 2011 +0200 > > update TODO > > i no add this todo in TODO list (recursively todo %), and as this my > opinion may be not relevant with author. > > As i understand start_io option force write data after defragment, > without buffering it in memory. > > > v1 -> v2 > Fixed spelling in TODO > > v2 -> v3 > Deleted todo from code > Fix compilation issues > Delete fallback code, because BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG_RANGE supported as > 2.6.29 oldest longterm 2.6.32.63 > Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
