On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Lennart Poettering <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 25.11.13 15:20, Dave Reisner ([email protected]) wrote: > >> uint64_t can be formatted correctly with %ju, rather than casting to >> unsigned and potentially losing accuracy. > > Oh, shouldn't we be careful with that? %j is for intmax_t. Which might > or might not be int64_t. Given that int128_t is already on the horizon > (newer gcc already support __int128 on 64bit machines...), I wouldn't be > surprised if intmax_t is growing to 128bit eventually. > > Format strings don't really have a nice way to print fixed-size > integers I fear... the only stuff that is correct is the "PRIu64" macro, > but that's fricking ugly... > > I think PRIu64 is still a better, more future-proof option than %j though...
I'm about to change all this stuff to print the ifname rather than the index, so please leave it as is for now. Cheers, Tom _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
