On Mon, 07.03.11 17:14, Dr. Werner Fink (wer...@suse.de) wrote: > > > It has to be possible to fulfill FHS not only in theory but > > > in practice. That is that if an network interface has to up > > > for the NFS share /usr then systemd should support this. > > > > The 1000ths time: it has nothing to do with systemd, and it fails > > today already in many setups, also with sysv. > > As I'm the maintainer of sysvinit here, I'd like to know which > setup fails.
Doesn't have to do much with sysvinit. > > LSB means nothing for many distros, and you can tell it wrong, but it > > will not change anything. > > Hmmm ... AFAIK RedHat has not left the Linux Foundation, does this > mean that RedHat will ignore the results of the LSB working group? Fedora has never been following the LSB really, stuff like libexec does not exist in LSB/FHS, but does in Fedora. And on Fedora LSB headers in init scripts always have been the exception not the rule. > > What will happen is that /usr will be on the rootfs. :) > > All joking apart, I'd like to see some generic support within > systemd for partitions as specified in FHS ;) systemd has no problems with a split off /usr. Stop asking for this, because it's already there. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
