Hi WG,

I have edited syslog-protocol so that we are now at -protocol-03. I have
submitted it to the IETF this morning, but as the draft editor is
probably very swamped with the number of new IDs prior to the Seoul
meeting, I have agreed with Chris on publishing the not yet officially
relased ID on my site. I do so in the hope that this will allow us to
work out some of the issues before Seoul (and eventually identify new
ones).

It was a rather complete edit, I have placed a full change log on my
comment's page at

http://www.syslog.cc/ietf/drafts/comments-draft-ietf-syslog-protocol-03.
html

This page also links to the "unofficial" -protocol-03 version. This
version addresses many of the issues we discussed the past days. Rather
than individual replies, I'd appreciate if you could have a look at the
new ID.

For those without time to access the web, my edit summary is as follows:

- general text-cleanup. Abstract and Intro modified. I noticed some old
text survived in the begininng of section 4, removed that, some typos
caught, probably twice as much added ;)

- section 3, transport mappings clarified, section 3.1, UDP transport
required [see issue 10]

- maximum syslog message size is now 1280 bytes (I assume this *is* the
minimum IPv6 MTU, had no time to check) [see issue 11]  ... oops, sorry
folks, accidently I removed the max size altogether ... shame on me for
rushing. 1280 will be back in in -protocol-04 ;)

- section 4.2 - MSG - now specifies UTF-8 including including all
control characters [see issue 9]

- section 4, TRAILER has been removed [see issue 6]

- section 6, multi-part messages heavily changed. Name change from
fragmentation to "multi-part messaging", more definitions, hopefully
clearer description (some of the term names are *really* lenghty -
advise on better terms is taken thankfully).

- section 7, definition of structured data element IDs (and semantics)
added

- section 7.1 - time - tries to solve issue 12

- section 7.2 - orgin - tries to provide a way to preserve originator IP
addresses inside the message. "origin" is also a key element when relay
RFC 3164 operations will be described (I didn't manage to get this into
the -03 version).

- section 8, "relay operations" added, but so far it is more or less
empty.

- section 9, "security considerations" cleaned up.

- section 9.1 - diagnostic logging - added as a security consideration.
Comments on this are highly appreciated. This was not previously
discussed on the WG mailing list

I am looking forward to all comments.

Rainer
PS: I am unfortunately not able to attend the Seoul meeting personally,
but Chris has agreed to act as proxy (thanks, Chris!)


Reply via email to