Issue 3: IANA Considerations for undefined PRI values http://www.employees.org/~lonvick/draft-ietf-syslog-sign-12.html#iana
>From Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/syslog-sec%40employees.org/msg01213.html http://www.mail-archive.com/syslog-sec%40employees.org/msg01218.html http://www.mail-archive.com/syslog-sec%40employees.org/msg01220.html http://www.mail-archive.com/syslog-sec%40employees.org/msg01226.html The consensus appears to be to have a new part in the "IANA Considerations" of syslog-sign stating the Facilities not defined are open to future use by the consensus process (RFC 2434 page 6). The current set of Facilities and Severities are listed by IANA here: http://www.iana.org/assignments/syslog-parameters Any disagreement to that?
