At 09:02 AM 11/12/2001 +0900, Glenn Mansfield Keeni wrote: >> A few days ago, I got a note from David Harrington of the SNMPv3 >> Working Group suggesting that we think about a MIB specification >> for syslog. I received no objections from our ADs when I asked >> them about this, so perhaps we should think about it. >Excellent. We should do this! We have been doing some ground work >here (configuring syslog with SNMP sets). But have not found a platform >for discussing [considering the general reception to SNMP ideas :-(] >> >> David has recommended Bruno Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as someone >> who could write the ID. I've been in touch with him and found >> that he is willing to undertake the work. >Will there be any discussion/presentation on this at Saltlake ? If yes, >could I have a few minutes to present our ideas on this. If you need any >volunteers, you have one. I will be glad to collaborate.
Hi Glenn, I'm a firm believer that meetings are only held for purposes that require face-to-face meetings. That usually means, "to resolve conflict". I also like to keep these discussions on the mailing list as there are interested people who cannot get to the meetings. I did see that Bruno sent you separately a copy of his ID submission. The ID editors are understandably busy with the -00 submissions right now so let's give them some time. But when the ID gets into the repository, let's use it as a basis of discussions. If you have additional ideas, or if you have some points that could be discussed before the ID is in the repository, please bring them up to the group. We will always like to hear your ideas on the subject since you are implementing code. :-) Thanks, Chris