How much have you implemented ? May be I can also help . I will study the theory that is required .
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:04:30 PM UTC+5:30, F. B. wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 10:07:12 AM UTC+2, Abhishek K Das wrote: >> >> I am interested in special relativity . >> Okay , the thing is I am currently an undergraduate in electrical >> engineering . I had a basic course on special relativity . >> I don't know about Minkowski space and stuff . I was thinking of starting >> with simple stuff in relativity. >> > > The point is, the deeper your knowledge is, the more elegant is the way > you can represent it on a CAS. > > >> You are saying that as soon as tensor thing is done , you can easily >> implement relativity . >> > > Yes, because abstract tensors implicitly contain the transformation laws > of relativity theory (and other symmetries), and allow to write formulae in > a frame-independent way. Actually, most of modern physics uses tensors. But > it will take some time before tensors are ready for use. > > >> I basically need some project ideas to work on . It can be anything >> existing or anything new . Can you provide me with >> some ideas to work upon . >> >> > A very simple idea: Lorentz transformations by 4 x 4 matrices. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/48197bb7-0562-42aa-af21-b412bc875f13%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
