On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Chris Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is trying to increase covereage a sprint worthy goal? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. > Actually, SymPy has fairly good coverage. The things not covered are usually fairly complex (eg. quantum physics modules) and it's not easy to get into them. I know because I tried (the rest of the missing code is usually things like error handling, or stuff in utilities that aren't that important anyway; all-in-all we are at about 82% and that's quite a good result). I think for a sprint it would be a better idea to dig up some more EasyToFix issues, though I suppose working on coverage is ok if nothing else can be found. -- Vladimir Perić -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
