On 7 Jun., 09:10, Luke <[email protected]> wrote: > Before doing this, I wanted to see what people thought about the > organization of this module, because this will influence how the docs > are organized. Currently, there are several files in sympy/physics, > and then there is physics/quantum, and there is physics/classical [0]. > A few questions: > > 1) Should any of the code in sympy.physics be bundled into it's own > submodule (similar to quantum and/or classical)?
You could have either a 'physics' submodule and a 'classical' subsubmodule, or a 'classical physics' and a 'quantum physics' submodule. I don't really care either way, and this should be easy to change later. The first one corresponds more to the (intended) structure of the physics-related code. > 2) Are there reasons this part of sympy has not been added to > docs.sympy.org in the past (other than lack of time)? No, it should be there, it is just that noone yet made sure it's generated correctly when building the docs. Vinzent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
