Hello. >> I don't know which module this is or where it came from.
DM's example came from the LXX module, so I had a closer look. >> If you click a word which isn't highlighted but should be from the strongs >> number search, then right-click and choose "inspect" I found in the case I >> investigated that the word didn't have the correct strong's number. The information shown in the web result for say, Gen 10:12 is wrong indeed for several words in the sentence, including μεγάλη, which should have been highlighted in the first place as it match G3173 but is shown as being associated with G3588. Note that: 1) the Strong's number tagging for this verse is correct in the LXX module when viewed with xiphos. 2) The source document for the LXX does not contain any Strong's number information, those have been added from external source: it is most possible there are some errors here and there. 3) As the Strong lexicon for greek cover only the words present in the new testament, there is an important number of words not tagged in the LXX because they occurs only in the old testament. On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 at 22:13, Troy A. Griffitts <scr...@crosswire.org> wrote: > > Thanks, DM. I also can see the odd behavor. A few things make sense. If > you click a word which isn't highlighted but should be from the strongs > number search, then right-click and choose "inspect" I found in the case I > investigated that the word didn't have the correct strong's number. I don't > know which module this is or where it came from. I am glad the modules team > has remained active over the years, but we haven't had a consistent leader > there and at least one person on that team repeatedly ignores me when I ask > them not the change the source for a module without research into the > pedigree of the source text. Many of the texts our modules team had used for > modules in the past years, I suspect, originated from us== from a Bible > Foundation text, which was taken by Blue Letter Bible or someone else and > then our team went and pulled that module as the source. But that's another > topic. > > Anyway, I think I've done a module refresh for SWORDWeb recently so its > modules should be close to what is in our main repository. I would guess > that those same misalignments of strong's numbers would be present in any of > our frontends. > > Though some of the other problems you mention are a bit baffling. I am not > sure why sometimes the wrong word is highlighted when you click on another > word. I'd have to look into that one. > > How are you?! > > Troy > > > On 4/27/25 7:45 AM, DM Smith wrote: > > Troy, > > Take a look at > https://www.crosswire.org/study/wordsearchresults.jsp?mod=LXX&searchTerm=lemma:G3173&colorKey=3173&colorMorph= > I’m seeing several strangenesses. > 1) The hit list does not have highlighting in every verse. > 2) Some of the words highlighted are not G3173. Typically, the wanted word is > nearby. > 3) Clicking on words may bring up an empty popup, an incomplete popup (click > on ὁ G3588 in the first verse), a popup for an adjacent word, or no popup at > all. The word clicked on isn’t highlighted across other verses. Try clicking > on the words in Genesis 10:12. > > Really odd. I didn’t look at the page source but don’t see rhyme or reason in > the behavior. > > In Him, > DM > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
